Belt: 'I'm enjoying baseball again'


Belt: 'I'm enjoying baseball again'

Programming Note: Giants-Angels coverage gets underway tonight at 6:30 p.m. with Giants Pregame Live, then Kruk and Kuip are behind the mic at 7 p.m. from Anaheim, only on Comcast Sportsnet Bay Area!
ANAHEIM Brandon Belts hitting streak is only at sevengames, but its the longest of his career. And it isnt just composed of groundsingles and bloopers, either.

Belt has one extra-base hit in five of those seven games,including three home runs. He hit the ball with authority twice while reachingbase in all four plate appearances during the Giants 5-3 victory at AngelStadium on Monday.

Added to his ability to draw a walk, which didnt completely disappeareven when he was struggling, and Belt has become a major on-base presence. Hehas a .571 OBP to go along with a .455 average during his hitting streak,lifting his season OBP to a very lofty .379.

RELATED: Brandon Belt career stats 2012 Game logs

Its a far cry from the hitter who slumped his shoulders andclearly lacked for confidence in his first 48 games, when he was just a .224hitter with no home runs and a .328 slugging percentage.

Hes really settling in here, Giants manager Bruce Bochysaid. Hes throwing out good at-bats and I think its helped him to go outthere every day, too. Hes getting those four at-bats, knowing hes going to bein the lineup. I know thats helped him settle down.

But Ill add to that. It took some adjustments on his part.I dont think it wouldve helped him earlier to play more until he made someadjustments.

Bochys qualification, no doubt, was aimed at his critics the vocal faction of Giants fans who made a fuss whenever Aubrey Huff or BrettPill was at first base.

Belt is clearing his hips better and turning on pitches.Those are among the adjustments coaches wanted him to make this spring, and itsbeen an ongoing process. Having the opportunity to work on it against majorleague pitching, rather than during batting practice or in the minors, hasallowed Belt to get comfortable.

What does Belt think?

Thats a great way to describe it, he said. Its gettingcomfortable and confident. Confidence is something Ive lacked in the past.Right now its high and Im enjoying baseball again. Just keep doing what Imdoing and keep riding the wave.

What they're saying: 2017 Baseball Hall of Fame class

What they're saying: 2017 Baseball Hall of Fame class

The National Baseball Hall of Fame inducted Jeff Bagwell, Tim Raines and Ivan Rodriguez Wednesday. Here's what they and their peers are saying.

Still on outside, Bonds, Clemens have become invaluable to Hall

Still on outside, Bonds, Clemens have become invaluable to Hall

The Baseball Hall of Fame becomes yesterday’s news Friday, as it always does. Three months of buildup, one day to announce the names, one day to castigate the voters for their willfully negligent slights, and then nine months of hibernation.

So much for the concept of “joining the immortals.”

But at least Jeff Bagwell, Tim Raines and Ivan Rodriguez never have to go through this annual pageant of nonsense again.

Barry Bonds does, though, and so does Roger Clemens, and to a lesser extent, so does Curt Schilling. They are the new litmus strips for the Hall, and they will more than replace Raines (voter ignorance division) and Bagwell (presumption of guilt with evidence division) for self-involved debate.

And in that adjusted role from doomed outsiders to serious candidates, Bonds and Clemens – and to a lesser extent again, Schilling – have become invaluable to the Hall, and their eventual election and induction will reduce the Hall’s ability to inflame passions outside the seamhead community.

On a day when Bagwell and Raines finally cleared the 75 percent threshold and Bonds and Clemens moved from 45 percent to 53.8 and 54.1 percent, respectively, the Hall of Fame Debating And Chowder Society saw the end times for its power as a multi-month debate-churner.

The blatherers are dead, long live the blatherers.

An entire mini-industry of Hall watchers has been spawned, in part by the now-feted Ryan Thibodaux and his exit polling but also by the debates about what the Hall should be and who should get to decide it. It has made days like Wednesday event viewing when it hadn’t been for years. For that, the Hall owes Bonds and Clemens a debt that the powers inside Major League Baseball wishes it didn’t have to pay. But the day they are inducted is the day that PEDs die as a debating point. The answer will have been provided, and there will be no more need for discussion.

Worse yet, the BBWAA’S new voter transparency rules may unfortunately impact our pal Thibodaux, whose seminal work in this understudied area of social science undermined ballot secrecy. In short, if everyone has to fess up, the desperate need to know early returns may dry up.

Oh, there will always be the day of post mortem-ization, as those who didn’t clear the threshold are subject to a few rounds of the popular parlor game, “Who Got Snubbed, And The Tedious And Half-Informed Reasons Why.”

For instance, the big debating point from today’s results will not be about Raines and Guerrero getting in, but what happened to the Bonds and Clemens votes. People have already postulated that a lot of the jump in their respective votes can be directly linked to Bud Selig’s election from the Veterans Committee. Voters who had previously ridden the Hall-as-temple argument suddenly lost their raison d’etre and realized that the PED problem was an industry matter rather than a greedy players’ matter.

In short, they saw Selig getting in as tacit approval that the PED issue was no longer a moral one in baseball but a cynical one, a way to blame labor for management’s culpability. That is an irony whose existence Selig will almost surely deny, but it’s there anyway, and it represents one more non-glacial change in a system that has been nearly immovable for most of its existence.

The next change, of course, may be removing the vote from the BBWAA and turning it over to a more malleable panel of “experts” who may not skew as young and values-neutral as the BBWAA of the future seems to be heading. That course may be hastened if/when Bonds and Clemens are elected, because halls of fame in their more traditional role have been more about rewarding friends and punishing enemies, and a large and shifting electorate makes that harder to accomplish.

The argument against such a course, though, is that the current system of three months of fevered public debate about the same old stuff works for the Hall’s sense of its importance. I mean, MLB Network and its fetish for shrill argument only has so much reach.

By Friday, though, all of this will revert to its typically inert state. Bonds, Clemens (ATALE Schilling), PEDs, morality, practicality, secrecy, old voter/young voter – all of it will fade back into insignificance.

And in a year or two or maybe three, Bonds and Clemens will wipe it all out by being included in the one club that we once knew would never tolerate their presence, and the Hall Of Fame’s Golden Age Of Shrieking Argument will end.

In a weird and largely unpleasant way, it will be missed.