Giants promote Nady, five others

870563.jpg

Giants promote Nady, five others

CHICAGO Xavier Nady will be among six Giants added whenactive rosters expand on Saturday, and manager Bruce Bochy hints strongly thatthe Cal alumnus and Salinas native could find himself starting immediately inleft field.

Hes been swinging the bat well, Bochy said of the veteranoutfielder. So well find out.

The Giants will activate right-hander Shane Loux,right-hander Brad Penny and first baseman Aubrey Huff from the 15-day disabledlist, Bochy said. Theyll add another bench bat in Brett Pill, who will berecalled from Fresno. And along with Nady, the club also will purchase thecontract of right-hander Jean Machi from Fresno.

Bochy and the staff will continue to evaluate whether tobring up a second wave of callups after Fresnos season ends on Monday. InfielderConor Gillaspie is on the 40-man roster and could be brought up easily enough,along with relievers Steve Edlefsen and Dan Runzler. But the Giants seldom bringup players just for the sake of occupying a locker.

Nady is the one piece who could make an impact, especiallywith Gregor Blanco really struggling to make consistent contact since takingover as the left fielder following Melky Cabreras 50-game drug suspension.

Nady has experience up here, Bochy said. Hes a dangeroushitter and we like the way hes been swinging the bat.

Could Nady be a regular in a left field platoon, playingagainst left-handers?

No, not just against lefties, Bochy said. Well get withthe staff and figure out our best option in left field.

It appears there wont be another option from the outsideworld. Any player the Giants acquired from outside the organization afterFriday would not be eligible to play in the postseason.

Nady, 33, got off to a slow start for Fresno after theGiants signed him to a minor league contract Aug. 4, but picked it up andcompiled a .270 average and .343 on-base percentage along with six home runsand five doubles in 89 at-bats. He hit three homers in a two-game span lastweekend at Reno, although the ballpark there is a launching pad.

Nady had made the Washington Nationals' opening day rosterbut was released earlier this month after he hit .157 with three home runs andsix RBIs in 40 games. He hadn't appeared in a major league game since late Junebecause of an ongoing wrist issue, but told Giants officials that he washealthy.

Nady played primarily in left field with the Nationals, but has experience inright field and first base as well.

Nady broke into the big leagues with Bochy in San Diego. Over 920 career gameswith the Padres, Mets, Pirates, Yankees, Cubs, Diamondbacks and Nationals, Nadyowns a .271 average with 100 home runs and 399 RBIs.

To create room on the 40-man roster for Nady, the Giants transferred Freddy Sanchez to the 60-day disabled list. One more 40-man move remains pending to create room for Machi; the club could recall minor league outfielder Roger Kieschnick and transfer him to the 60-day DL, but that would mean paying him a prorated portion of the major league salary.

Hall of Fame voters' biggest issue: Do they work for the job or the sport?

Hall of Fame voters' biggest issue: Do they work for the job or the sport?

With Jeff Bagwell and Tim Raines, and maybe even Trevor Hoffman about to be voted into the Baseball Hall of Fame, we have re-entered the hellish debates about who should vote, and why they should vote, and whether needles are good or bad and whether both are trumped by cashing the checks those needles made possible and why being transparent about their votes is good and why being transparent about their votes is actually bad.
 
In other words, the Hall of Fame isn’t actually about players any more. It’s about the voters.
 
The Danes call this “rampant narcissism.”
 
We have danced around this central fact for years now, hiding behind debates about performance enhancing drugs and the profiting thereof, voting limits and their degree of strangling artificiality, and the new writers vs. the old veterans, and who should be vilified, justifiably or otherwise, by whom.
 
Yay hatred by proxy!
 
But the process arguments ultimately aren’t the central point here. The argument is really about something more basic.
 
Are voter/journalists supposed to help enhance the mythology of the sport, or dispassionately tell its story? Who are they working for when they vote?

To that end, every vote tells a story well beyond the names checked off or the blank ballots submitted. One man, Ryan Thibodaux (@NotMrTibbs, to you), has been invaluable in delving into the voting minutiae from the growing number of voters who release their opinions early. But, and he’ll admit this if you strike him often enough, that’s still a process discussion, and the core of the debate is found elsewhere.
 
Baseball writers are like football writers and basketball writers and hockey writers and curling writers and blah-blah-blah-de-blah-blah, in that they are prone to love the sports they cover beyond their journalistic mandate. That’s probably true of most journalists in most fields, but baseball has the Hall of Fame outlet to allow this internal debate to play itself out before our faces.
 
So the question becomes whether their votes are the representation of dispassionate analysis, or a defense of the mythos of the sport and the concept of the Hall itself. Boiled down to its essence, who are the voters defending here, the sanctity of the myth, or the ugliness of the reality?
 
The answer, as it usually is, is, “Depends on who you talk to.”
 
Hall of Fame debates usually lump all voters into one amorphous blob, a level of lazy and stupid thinking that should in a more perfect world be punishable by death. Okay, we kid. Life on a Louisiana prison farm, with parole after 25 years.
 
In fact, voters cover a fairly wide swath of opinion, and for whatever perceived shortcomings they might have, there are enough of them (about 450) to be a fairly accurate measure of the diaspora of baseball opinion across social, cultural, sporting and chronological lines.
 
But the argument about whether an individual voter feels more responsible to the job he or she is paid to do or to the game he or she covers as part of that job remains largely unconsidered, or at the very least masked by other considerations.
 
This manifests itself all the way down to the hot-pocket word “cheating.” Baseball is about cheating, and about honor. It’s about racism, and trying to overcome it. It’s about greed, and selflessness. It’s a sport, and it’s a business. It’s America, in all its glorious and hideous manifestations. To employ “cheating” as a word is in itself dishonest, and given that everyone got rich off the PED era and kept all the money they made makes PED use a de facto workplace condition approved by management and labor.
 
That may be unsavory, and it certainly is illegal without a proper doctor’s prescription, but because by their inaction the owners decided not to punish it (and in fact chose to reward it with contracts and extensions for users even after testing was instituted), it isn’t “cheating.”
 
And even if that argument doesn’t heat your rec room, it isn’t the role of the writer to punish it. It is the role of the writer to reveal it by journalism means, but that’s where the journalist’s role ends. The people who ran baseball took the journalism, acknowledged it, and did nothing until it ramped up detection and did little other than blame the union for a failing that both sides share equally.
 
So in the end, Raines’ votes or Barry Bonds’ votes or Curt Schilling’s votes or Edgar Martinez’ votes are fun to debate, but they aren’t the issue. It’s whether the voters think when they sit down and confront their ballot every year who exactly they’re working for – the job, or the sport.
 
And yes, I vote. Voted for the maximum 10. You’ll find out tomorrow the contents of my ballot. Then you can make that a process story, too.

Obama celebrates World Series champion Chicago Cubs at White House

chicago-cubs-white-house.jpg
AP

Obama celebrates World Series champion Chicago Cubs at White House

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama celebrated the World Series champion Chicago Cubs on Monday and spoke about the power sports has to unite people.

"Throughout our history, sports has had this power to bring us together even when the country is divided,"Obama said at a White House ceremony for his hometown team. "Sports has changed attitudes and culture in ways that seem subtle but that ultimately made us think differently about ourselves."

"It is a game and celebration," he said, and noted that "there's a direct line between Jackie Robinson and me standing here." Robinson, a second baseman for the Brooklyn Dodgers, broke Major League Baseball's color line to become its first black player.

The White House event came four days before Obama hands the presidency over to Donald Trump following one of the most divisive elections in recent memory.

It also follows a weekend in which civil rights icon John Lewis said he didn't consider Trump a legitimate president because of Russian meddling in the election. Trump responded on Twitter by criticizing Lewis as "all talk" and suggesting the Democratic congressman take better care of his Georgia district.

Obama has a home in Chicago, but is a longtime White Sox fan. He rooted for the Cubs after the Sox failed to reach the playoffs.

His wife, first lady Michelle Obama, however, is a lifelong Cubs fan. She greeted Cubs players before the ceremony, which Obama noted was her first appearance at some of the roughly 50 events he has hosted for championship college and professional sports teams.

The Cubs gave Obama two baseball jerseys — home and away — with the number 44, among other gifts. Cubs first baseman Anthony Rizzo also wears the number, and Obama referred to Rizzo as "my fellow 44."Obama is the nation's 44th president.

Obama said it will be hard for him to wear the jersey, but told the Cubs: "Do know that among Sox fans I am the Cubs' No. 1 fan."

Hours after the Cubs won the series in November, Obama asked the team on Twitter if it wanted to visit the White House before his term ends Friday.

The World Series title was the first for the Cubs since 1908, and they won it by defeating the Cleveland Indians in seven games.