Raiders Report (822): Injured players practice

220911.jpg

Raiders Report (822): Injured players practice

Aug. 22, 2011GUTIERREZ ARCHIVE
RAIDERS PAGE RAIDERS VIDEOFollow @PGutierrezCSN
Paul Gutierrez
CSNCalifornia.comPractice No. 19Summary: News, news and more news. The day began with the Raiders selecting disgraced Ohio State quarterback Terrelle Pryor in the third round of the NFL's supplemental draft.
NEWS: Raiders take Terrelle Pryor in Supplemental Draft
It continued with several familiar, if injured faces (in one case, literally) practicing again. Continued with the starting quarterback, who took a knee to the helmet on Saturday, sitting out practice as a precaution. Went on with the future of the Raiders' annual exhibition game against the 49ers in serious jeopardy after last weekend's violence at Candlestick Park. And ended with coach Hue Jackson saying Pryor would be a quarterback. At least, to begin his NFL career. Oh yeah, the Raiders took to the field in helmets and shoulder pads and worked on two-minute drill offense as well as red-zone offense. Coaches seemed especially on edge. As they should be after the showing against the 49ers.Injury report: Even with some notable players returning to practice, 16 players sat out practice with various "nicks," including quarterback Jason Campbell (concussion-like symptoms) receivers Louis Murphy (hamstringgroin), Chaz Schilens (sprained right knee) and Shawn Bayes, tight ends Kevin Boss (left knee sprain) and David Ausberry, fullback James McCluskey, offensive linemen Stephon Heyer (strained right triceps), Lou Eliades and Alan Pelc, defensive backs Hiram Eugene (dislocated left hip), Chris Johnson (oil change, yes, he said oil change), Mike Mitchell (left knee) and Zac Etheridge (knee) and defensive lineman John Henderson. Offensive lineman Daniel Loper and cornerback Walter McFadden, however, both missed practice due to the births of their respective children.Offensive play of the day: It was a simple pitch play to the right side but Darren McFadden made it look easy, and like a thing of beauty. He ran just as smooth as he did hard and galloped past the defense, barely breaking stride in nine-on-nine, non-contact drills.Defensive play of the day: With his speed in the open field, a quick slant to Jacoby Ford seems a sure thing. But not this time. Not with Michael Huff shadowing the diminutive Ford. Huff broke up the pass and several onlookers held their breath as Ford was getting in his first live work since suffering his broken left hand.Returning to work: The big news, of course, were the returns of running back Darren McFadden, who suffered a fractured lower left eye orbital on Aug. 3, and receiverreturner Jacoby Ford, who broke his left hand on July 30. Perhaps just as uplifting to the Raiders were rookie running back Taiwan Jones, who has been out since the first week of camp with a hamstring issue, and defensive end Trevor Scott, who suffered a torn ACL in his left knee at Pittsburgh last Nov. 21, joining the fray. "We got some of my toys back," said coach Hue Jackson. "I'm excited about that."Personnel report: Obviously, the seismic shift in Silver and Blackdom had to do with the Raiders that third-round draft pick to select Pryor in the NFL's supplemental draft. As soon as he signs, which his agent said would be very soon, the Raiders will have the maximum 90 names on their training camp roster. Per NFL rules, rosters have to be down to a max of 80 by 1 p.m. PT on Aug. 30, and then at 53 by 1 p.m. PT on Sept. 3. Flying under the radar over the weekend was former Raiders middle linebacker Ricky Brown signing with New England as a free agent.Rookie report: OK, so technically only one of these guys is a rookie, receiver Eddie McGee. But he showed some fire in his lighting-quick fight with second-year cornerback Joe Porter on a side field during unit drills. It was over as fast as it started.Quotable: "This young man is a quarterback. That's where we're going to start and we'll go from there." -- Raiders coach Hue Jackson on Terrelle PryorNext practice: Tuesday, 3:30 p.m.

Battle between Raiders, Chiefs for AFC West isn't over yet

Battle between Raiders, Chiefs for AFC West isn't over yet

The Raiders were clearly frustrated by Thursday night’s proceedings. A pivotal game against Kansas City didn’t go as planned, moving the Chiefs ahead in the AFC West with three games to play.

Few thought the Raiders would be able to win a game played two time zones away, in the bitter cold, on a short week. Players and coaches certainly did. They left Kansas City believing they could’ve and should’ve won.

Tackle Donald Penn wasn’t thrilled following this missed opportunity, and articulated how the entire team felt.

“My mindset is that I’m pissed right now,” Penn said. “I’m pissed. We had control and we gave it to somebody else.”

Records are now even at 10-3, but Kansas City has a tiebreaker in hand following a season sweep. The Raiders dropped into the wild-card pool and are currently the AFC’s No. 5 seed.

Those facts would only matter if the season ended today. It, you know, doesn’t. That makes the where-are-they-now exercise purely academic, with time for things to change.

“We will continue working,” running back Latavius Murray said. “Like Coach (Del Rio), ‘What we want in our goals and what we’re after, those things are still out there for us.’ We won’t let this determine who we are and what we want to accomplish."

Kansas City can win the division by winning out. They have home games against Tennessee and Denver before wrapping the season at San Diego, teams with a combined 19-17 record and two pushing for the playoffs.

The Raiders have a tough slate ahead, with a game at San Diego, home against Indianapolis and at Denver to end the year. That trio has an identical record to K.C.’s slate, with two common opponents.

So, with that in mind, the Raiders-Chiefs competition will continue through season’s end. How each team fares will determine the AFC West, although Denver shouldn’t be counted out quite yet.

That should make for a fantastic finish in a talented division that should qualify at least two teams for the postseason.

That also means the Raiders and Chiefs might meet again in the rivalry that will define the season for both teams.

“I feel pretty confident that both of our teams will end up in the playoffs,” head coach Jack Del Rio said. “There are still three games to be played. We’ll see how it ends up. They have the leg up right now, and did enough to win both games this year. For now, that’s all there is to the story. They’ve earned that. We’ll just have to get back on the right track next week.”

The Raiders may be down, but they definitely aren’t out of the division race. Thursday’s game was heavily hyped and rightfully so, but losing wasn’t a death sentence. A strong response could claim the division title or, at the very least, provide positive momentum heading into the playoffs.

The Raiders and Chiefs could meet again in January, when it truly matters most.

“There is a potential to play again,” quarterback Derek Carr said, “which is awesome.”

Oakland takes stage in latest act of Empty Gesture Theatre

Oakland takes stage in latest act of Empty Gesture Theatre

Editor's Note: The above video is from Nov. 6, 2016.

As we consider with the distance and clarity of the new day the latest developments from the City of Oakland in the attempt to attract the Raiders to stay where they are, we are reminded of one very important thing.

The Raiders STILL aren’t a part of these talks. Haven’t been, don’t want to be, and unless put in a bind won’t consider it.

In other words, what we have here is a deal between a city and a developer to buy land and build something FOR NO INTERESTED TENANT. Why this has escaped most people is an amazement, but there we are.

So I am now willing to predict a third potential outcome for this slow-motion train to nowhere: The league kicks the can down the road, putting off making a decision on the fate of the Raiders until one of these deals gets sweetened to its liking.

Now, back to the hilarious present.

The only intriguing thing about this new term sheet between the City of Oakland (throw-weight, $200 million) and the Ronnie Lott-fronted Fortress group (throw-weight: $175 million for the land as a starter) is that it exists at all.

But it isn’t a deal that seems to be attracting much notice from the NFL, the Raiders, or really anyone else. It is Empty Gesture Theatre, and frankly, it probably shouldn’t be anything more than that. Cities have been screwed into near-bankruptcy pandering to sports teams for decades, and both Oakland and Nevada deserve better -- though people don't often recognize what they deserve.

Now let’s reiterate the problems here:

The Raiders desperately want to leave. Mark Davis believes his best chance at future glory is in Nevada, and nobody has been able to shift him off that position, even though he has apparently been told as recently as two weeks ago that he does not yet have the 24 votes from his fellow owners at present.

Oakland has neither the money nor the political will to make a proposal that will dazzle the Raiders into staying. Mayor Libby Schaaf has committed the city to $200 million in infrastructure costs and no more, and part of the time-honored stadium soak is that a city throws in a lot more money, either through bond issues, tax increases, free land or a deal with the concrete guy. That cities shouldn’t even be in this business has dawned on Schaaf, and she really wants out of this deal is a regular tenant who will see to it that the taxes are paid in regular installments.

The NFL is frustrated that Oakland isn’t playing the city’s traditional role as a sucker. It doesn’t much like the Fortress people, either, which is still slightly more benign than its view of Las Vegas Casino owner Sheldon Adelson, who is still a linchpin of the Vegas deal even though he threatens to leave.

In short, Oakland provided no particular reason to have the owners look more kindly upon it, at a time when they want a reason to reject Vegas on market-size grounds. It is in many ways the Carson-v.-Inglewood fight of 11 months ago, in which the league’s owners had to decide on the site they liked (Inglewood and Rams owner Stan Kroenke) against the guy they liked (San Diego Changers owner Dean Spanos).

They voted the money, as you knew they would. The Rams are building in Inglewood, and apparently will joined, albeit with great reluctance, by the Chargers, who were rejected with great vigor by the voting citizens of San Diego last month.

Now in this scenario, the Vegas deal is the one with the short-term money but the long-term danger signs, while the Oakland deal has the market size but not the money or the will. And in the Oakland deal, the league doesn’t have direct leverage over Davis to modify his level of franchise control, which it very much wants to happen sooner rather than later.

So the other 31 owners can either accept one deal they don't like, another deal they don’t like, or give it another year in hopes that some deus ex machina will appear and make the decision for them. Typically the NFL at its most powerful had the outcome cemented ahead of time and just acted, but this is not the NFL of 20 years ago. It has been reactive throughout, letting events come to it, in exchange for which it now has two unappealing options with which to deal.

So I would expect the NFL to consider its options and delay a decision yet again. It wants neither Adelson, Fortress, the Oakland plan or the Vegas market, so it is most likely, barring some radical change in the current equation, to wait for a more clement time to strong-arm its desired conclusion upon everyone.

In the true spirit of NFL Christmas: Ho ho ho, and hands up, suckers.