Tollefson brings championship pedigree back to Raiders


Tollefson brings championship pedigree back to Raiders

Dave Tollefson was channeling his inner Lloyd Christmas during a conference call with Bay Area media on Tuesday afternoon.The newest Raiders defensive lineman, signed as a free agent on Saturday after five years and two Super Bowl rings with the New York Giants, was asked how his championship pedigree would rub off on his new teammates.RELATED: Signing with Raiders homecoming for Tollefson
"I don't know much, but there's a few things I do know," Tollefson said after a brief pause. "And one of them is getting in the tournament. I mean, you've got to have a chance. If you're not in the tournament -- which is playoffs when I say that -- you don't have a chance."I always like to quote my favorite movie "Dumb and Dumber," when he was asking what are the chances a girl like (you) and a guy like (me) can be together and she says, 'One in a million.'"The character of Christmas, played by Jim Carey in the 1994 film, was anything but crestfallen."And Jim Carey says, 'So you're saying there's a chance,'" Tollefson recounted with a laugh. "Just to have the opportunity to play for the title and get in the playoffs, that's all you need. And then you take it one game at a time and next thing you know you're hoisting up the Lombardi Trophy. There's no secret to winning championships. It's just a matter of doing the work and when it comes to playoff time, taking advantage of the opportunities."In Gotham, the Walnut Creek native who grew up in Concord and played at Ygnacio Valley High was a role player, of sorts, on the Giants' fearsome defensive line. Drafted by Green Bay in the seventh round (No. 253 overall) of the 2006 draft out of Northwest Missouri State and later being a member of the Raiders' practice squad, Tollefson played behind and alongside some of the game's best at the position and contributed his own flavor.Michael Strahan. Osi Umenyiora. Justin Tuck."It's huge, man." Tollefson said. "To be the best, you've got to be around the best, you've got to be surrounded by people that are successful in order for yourself to be successful. So being with those group of guys for that period of time was really special."I just got here (to Oakland) today, my first workout in today, but there's a group of guys here that can play ball up front, too, which is exciting to see. I'm not quite an old, wily vet yet. I've got a few years left in me. I think I've seen quite a bit in this league and they got a group of guys here that can do some big things also. I look back fondly on my time with those guys (in New York). It was special, for sure, but you can't dwell on the past. You've got to keep going forward and make the future."The 6-foot-4, 266-pound Tollefson has started just two of the 62 career games in which he's played and he's not expected to replace either Lamarr Houston or a physically-healed Matt Shaughnessy in the starting lineup. Rather, he's expected to provide a boost off the bench and on special teams.Last season, Tollefson, 29, played in all 16 regular season games with the two starts and had career highs in tackles (21) and sacks (five). In his career, he has 81 tackles (56 solo), with 10 sacks, five passes defensed and three forced fumbles.RELATED: Dave Tollefson 2011 game logs
So what does he anticipate his on-field role being in Oakland?"You know, I think it's the multiplicitywhat I can do as a player," he said. "I played a lot of snaps inside. Will I do that here? I'm not quite sure. We've got a great groups of D tackles that can do a really good job inside. So I think that's what intrigued the Raiders about me, just the ability to do anything. And that's something that you have to do as a guy that hasn't necessarily started in this league."I've started a couple of games but you kind of got to be good at everything because you really don't know when an opportunity's going to come for you to contribute to a team winning a game. So I think that's what, hopefully, they're going to use me for. Just kind of, whatever, what do you need me to do? I can even mow the grass if you want to."Rather, the Raiders would prefer he mow down opposing running backs.The Raiders' run defense has been an Achilles' heel in recent years. Last season, the Raiders ranked 27th against the run, giving up 136.1 yards per game on the ground. The Giants, meanwhile, were 19th, with a 121.2 average."You've got to be physical and I think sometimes run defense can be overshadowed by a want to get sacks because that's considered to be such game-changing plays," Tollefson said. "But I'm always thinking you've got earn the right to rush the passer and the way you do that is by stopping the run. That's going to be a focus of mine no matter what, and I think it will be the guys' (focus) up front."You've got to do it up front and obviously the linebackers are named linebackers because they back the line. If the guys up front aren't getting the job done, it doesn't matter who you have behind you. It's definitely going to be a focus of ours -- stop the run -- because if you can't stop the run you better not even start thinking about getting sacks, because they'll just run the ball all day on you."

McKenzie: Osemele gave Raiders OL teeth, Nelson eased Woodson's loss

McKenzie: Osemele gave Raiders OL teeth, Nelson eased Woodson's loss

Raiders general manager built a foundation of talent heading into the 2016 offseason, but needed more to get his team over the hump. Draft picks were essential, and expected. He had significant salary cap space, where he could find some immediate impact players on the open market.

McKenzie signed six unrestricted free agents, a few of them at a hefty price. Most veteran imports worked out well, though some thrived more than others.

It was a solid group that, in addition to the 2017 draft class and some key undrafted pickups, helped McKenzie win the Pro Football Writers of America’s executive of the year award.

He singled out two members of the 2016 free-agent class that helped set the tone for a 12-4 regular season and the team’s first playoff berth since 2002.

Left guard Kelechi Osemele was the first. The former Baltimore Raven signed a record contract for interior linemen but was worth the price, adding attitude to the offensive line during an All-Pro season.

“I think Kelechi solidified our offensive line, from the standpoint of what we wanted from our run game, from a physicality standpoint, what we had always talked about from Day 1,” McKenzie said Thursday in a conference call. “He added to that and he put some teeth into the whole offensive mentality. I felt like that was an impact. I was happy to see him get his first Pro Bowl. That was good to see.”

McKenzie also highlighted free safety Reggie Nelson’s efforts. He signed late in the offseason for relatively cheap, but was voted a team captain after his first preseason as a Raider and helped the secondary function with confidence. That was required after losing the eminent Charles Woodson to retirement.

Nelson also had five interceptions and two fumble recoveries, including three takeaways that secured victory.

I thought Reggie [Nelson] made some plays and was a true leader back there. When we lost Charles Woodson, from the leadership standpoint, communication standpoint, I felt Reggie came in and did a solid job to help ease that transition. You can never replace a Charles Woodson, but he was able to help ease that transition, especially when we had a young rookie back there (in Karl Joseph).”

Let’s take a look at the Raiders unrestricted free agent class and how they fared:

LG Kelechi Osemele
Contract: 5 years, $58.5 million ($25.4 million guaranteed)
Impact:Osemele ranks among the league’s elite left guards, and brought a nastiness to the Raiders offensive line. He helped immensely in the run game, and didn’t allow a quarterback sack all season. He was a Pro Bowler and a first-team All Pro, the results McKenzie hoped for after offering Osemele a massive contract.

LB Bruce Irvin
Contract: 4 years, $37 million ($14.5 million guaranteed)
Impact: Irvin started slow but rounded into a dominant player and an excellent compliment to star edge rusher Khalil Mack. Irvin had seven sacks and an NFL-high six forced fumbles, showing enough versatility to play well in coverage and against the run.

CB Sean Smith
Contract: 4 years, $38 million ($15 million guaranteed)
Impact: Smith was benched in his first game, and struggled against Julio Jones in his second, but played better after than and largely well the rest of the year. His quarterback rating against was 114.0 and he allowed too many big plays. More is expected from a No. 1 cornerback. Smith had shoulder surgery after the season and vowed to be better in 2017.

FS Reggie Nelson
Contract: 2 years, $8.5 million ($4 million guaranteed)
Impact:Nelson wasn’t perfect in his first year as a Raider, but made some big plays during a Pro Bowl year. He had seven takeaways, including five interceptions, and some big hits in the clutch. He was a solid leader in the back who should be better with a year’s experience in a new system to his credit.

S Bryden Trawick
Contract: 1 year,  $675,000
Impact: Trawick was brought in to be a solid special teams player, and he thrived in that role. He was strong in kick and punt coverage, with a team-high 14 special teams tackles. He showed some defensive prowess late when forced into action, and the safety made some nice plays over the last two games.

LB Daren Bates
Contract: 1 year, $850,000
Impact: Bates is a special teams player first and, along with Trawick, helped anchor the coverage units. He had seven special teams tackles over the year.

Lott-led group still working to keep Raiders in Oakland, 'playing to win'

Lott-led group still working to keep Raiders in Oakland, 'playing to win'

SAN FRANCISCO -- Oakland civic leaders and deep-pocketed investors fighting to keep the Raiders from moving insist they are still in the game despite team owner Mark Davis formally applying to the NFL to relocate to Las Vegas.

A local investment group that includes Hall of Famer Ronnie Lott said Thursday they continue to negotiate with government officials, the team and the NFL to build a $1.25 billion, 55,000-seat stadium in Oakland.

"We are in this game and we are playing to win," Lott's group said in a statement. The statement said the Raiders' filing Thursday was expected and done to "keep its options open in Las Vegas."

The Raiders have been seeking to replace their dilapidated home for years. The Coliseum has suffered from sewage backups and other infrastructure problems. It's also the only remaining NFL stadium to also be home to a baseball team - the Athletics - and lacks many of the modern, money-making features of new stadiums.

Oakland Mayor Libby Schaaf has been negotiating with Davis and investors to find a new home for the team in the city but has said public financing is not an option. She and other local boosters support the bid by Lott's group to keep the team on Oakland.

"Only Oakland brings the Raiders and the NFL a competitive stadium proposal, along with legacy and loyalty," Schaaf said in a prepared statement.

The city and Alameda County still owe a combined $100 million for upgrades made to the stadium in 1995 to lure the Raiders back to Oakland after the team spent the 14 previous years playing in Los Angeles. The city and county were left holding the bag after personal seat licenses failed to cover the cost of the $220 million renovation that added more than 10,000 seats and luxury boxes.

The city is willing to give the team 60 acres of land on the Coliseum site to build a new stadium.

The local investors are competing with a Las Vegas plan that calls for $750 million in hotel room tax revenue, $650 million from billionaire casino owner Sheldon Adelson's company and $500 million from the Raiders and the NFL.

League owners are expected to vote on the proposed move in March.

Local boosters argue that Oakland offers a better football venue than Las Vegas, a transient tourist town with no professional football history. They say the San Francisco Bay Area's television market dwarves the Las Vegas region's and that it will cost the team $500 million to relocate.

"I think we continue to offer a far superior deal," said Scott Haggerty, president of the Alameda County Board of Supervisors. Haggerty is also on the board that manages the Coliseum.

"I think that Mark Davis has been very patient in trying to come up with a stadium plan and I don't blame him for keeping his options open," Haggerty said. "But the Raiders belong in Oakland."

Haggerty and others also say that a Raiders move out of the region threatens to alienate fans who re-embraced the team after it left Oakland after the 1981 season and played for 14 years in Los Angeles only to move back to the Bay Area.

Davis has said the team will continue to play in Oakland until the Las Vegas stadium is finished, likely by the 2020 season. The Raiders have two one-year options to play at the Oakland Coliseum in 2017 and 2018 and are already taking season ticket renewals for next season.

"I'm incredulous this could happen again," said 57-year-old Jim Zelinski, a lifelong Oakland resident and Raiders fan. "I'm disgusted, to be quite frank."

Nonetheless, Zelinski has co-founded a fan organization that is lobbying the Raiders and the NFL to keep the team in Oakland.

"We want to combat the narrative that most Raider fans are neutral and don't care if the team moves to Las Vegas," said Zelinski, who must decide by next month if he wants to renew his season tickets. "The Raiders need to do the right thing."