Ratto: Lack of leadoff man one of many Giant problems


Ratto: Lack of leadoff man one of many Giant problems

Ray RattoCSNBayArea.com

Sunday, it was Mike Fontenots turn to be Andres Torres in a 6-1 Giants loss to the Cardinals. Monday, it was Miguel Tejadas in a 6-1 loss to the Dodgers.
RECAP: Giants can't solve Kershaw, Dodgers win 6-1
In other words, the answer to the question What will the Giants do until Torres returns to be the leadoff hitter? is now officially, Whatever comes to Bruce Bochys mind that day.With this addendum: After he frets about the other parts of his team.With the Giants poised to make a decision Tuesday on Torres possible shelving (if they arent sure hell be ready by the weekend, they will almost surely disable him retroactive to Sunday), Bochy has decided to do what he has done with the 5-6-7-8 spots in the order all last year and this:Put a name there and see if it sticks.

So far, it isnt. Then again, this isnt a microproblem that could immediately be solved by Torres health or an effective replacement. This is a macro-thing, as in, the Giants dont score in many ways at all from any part of the lineup.Again.Torres joined Cody Ross on the couch, squeezing Bochys hand in what was supposed to be one of the most populous parts of his ball team, the outfield. Ross is still a good two weeks and change away from returning in full form, and Torres makes it a problem.Add to that the indifferent results of Brandon Belt, Pat Burrell and Aubrey Huff, and you get a team with far more profound issues than the leadoff hitter, and the reason why, even with a 10-spot against the Dodgers in L.A., the Giants are barely averaging three runs a game.True, Torres was the least agreeable injury the Giants could endure this year, save Buster Posey, because they dont have another leadoff hitter. None whatsoever.They have people whom they could put there in a pinch, true. Nate Schierholtz filled in for Torres after his Achilles tendon strained itself Saturday and went for 3-for-3. Fontenot got Sundays assignment and went 0-for-4 with three strikeouts. Tejada went 1-for-4 Monday. And no runs have been scored by any of them, and only one, Schierholtz triple in his last at-bat Saturday, resulted in a runner in scoring position, making those four hits pretty much empty calories.Bochy shrugged his voice (trust us, he can do this) when asked what his longer term plan was, largely because he knows that until Torres comes back, he has no linear solution. He spoke of Aaron Rowand, and Mark DeRosa, and yes, even Belt as possibilities.Belt was the name that raised eyebrows, given his 35 career plate appearances, .161 batting average, .257 on-base percentage and one stolen base. Truthfully, he seems overwhelmed right now in the seven-spot; at the top of the order, he could be crushed.Plus, as the starting first baseman, he would probably be the first of his kind to lead off in, well, damned near forever. Wed look it up, but in the time it took to do so, Mark Buehrle could pitch both ends of a doubleheader against the As.Still . . .I think he could do it in a pinch, Bochy said. Hes got good plate discipline, he can get on base, and he could even run some.But it isnt that Bochy believes that Belt is that guy; he merely reaffirmed that Belt could be a guy, and not one he would choose if he actually had a choice. Not now to be sure, and maybe not for a very long time.In saying he would consider it, though, he reaffirmed the dilemma when you have one of something, it is by definition irreplaceable.And his absence also underscores one other fact about the 2010 and 2011 Giants their margin for error is prosciutto-thin. They are neither hitting nor fielding, which more than eradicates the pitching theyve received.As a result, they are what they were at this time last year an incomplete team relying more than is prudent upon a pitching staff that cannot live on the subsistence run support they have received. Andres Torres fixes some of that upon his return, but not all. Not by a long shot.

Raiders' magic dissipates, but valuable lesson about contending learned

Raiders' magic dissipates, but valuable lesson about contending learned

So the Oakland Raiders are good, but not magical, let alone soaked in destiny. So they can make every game a hard slog for the opponent, but they are not invulnerable. So they can be inefficient, and too sure of themselves, and terribly wasteful when they’re cold.

In other words, they are part of the National Football League – no longer too good to be true.

Their performance against the Chiefs in Kansas City was a pyramid of blown opportunities, opportunities made necessary by a terrible start. A week ago, against a borderline playoff team, they could get away with it. Thursday, on hostile ground, against a team that has lost three of its previous 23 regular season games and has a defense that specializes in standing on your chest until you whistle Yankee Doodle through your navel, they couldn’t.

The result of the 21-13 loss in a game with 12 more points than degrees of temperature is that the Raiders are now the fifth-best team in the American Football Conference rather than the first-best team with four more chances to change that position.

In other words, Thursday’s defeat only provided this much wisdom: The Raiders are a good team vulnerable to other good teams with an iron-plated sense of purpose, stubborn defenses that can apply and maintain a chokehold for hours on end, and offenses that don’t feel compelled to imitate Oakland’s offense by getting into a shootout.

And also this: There is nothing that would necessarily prevent them from beating the Chiefs in case of a third match, even though Kansas City held them to fewer points in two games than they scored in every other game save one. They are still, as the pedants say, “in the argument.”

But they have flaws to be exposed against the right team in the right situation. Kansas City has been that team twice, and New England probably is, but there the list probably stops. Nobody in the AFC North or South seems terribly capable of matching them in neutral conditions, but here’s the other bone spur:

The playoffs are not about neutral conditions.

The Raiders have come a long way in what most people think is a long time, but in fact in terms of team construction, you can throw out everything before 2013, and almost everything before 2015. They are just now getting a full understanding of the hardest part of becoming a Super Bowl contender – the other Super Bowl contenders.

Yes, Kansas City has an indifferent playoff history under Andy Reid, but it is clear that under current conditions the Chiefs are serious players. And while we have no link to how the Raiders would fare against new England, we are pretty sure that they wouldn’t want to play the second weekend of January arse-deep in snow in Foxborough.

The point? Now they get how hard this contender stuff really is. They could not have learned that lesson any other way – not anyone they’ve played yet save Kansas City.

Their next lessons come in Weeks 16 and 17, when they face the frantically desperate Indianapolis Colts in Oakland and then the Broncos in Denver the week after. Desperate teams can be very difficult indeed, especially to teams that are safe and dry and home, playoff-wise.

And then there are the actual playoffs, which if they were played today would have the Raiders traveling to Houston for a very winnable game against the stultifying Texans. The week after, they could be either in Kansas City again or in New England, getting a gut full of visiting field disadvantage.

But as a learning experience, the Raiders may have come out very well indeed. They now know in very real and personal ways the real difference between where they think they should be and where they are, as well as how many ways this can go terribly wrong between now and then.

And also how well it can go, if they learn what the Chiefs taught them again Thursday.

Marshall's admission a reminder culture of health doesn't exist

Marshall's admission a reminder culture of health doesn't exist

Brandon Marshall of the New York Jets had one of his greatest games ever against the San Francisco 49ers two years ago and remembers almost none of it, because, as he told reporters Wednesday, he was cloudy-minded on painkillers.

This admission is one more reminder that sports are not necessarily good for one’s health, in large part because the culture of health in sports really doesn’t exist.

There is, rather, a culture of ordnance, and the players are the weaponry.

Marshall’s acknowledgement that he was masking pain from a high ankle sprain that should have kept him out of action for “four to six weeks,” by his own estimation but had him returning to action 10 days after the original injury.

“I’ll say it: I took a couple pain pills, so . . . I took a couple of pain pills to mask the pain,” he said on a conference call with CSN Bay Area's Matt Maiocco. “I really wasn’t supposed to play. So I don’t remember much from that game. I just remember catching those balls. That was pretty much it.”

We now re-enter the culture of playing when it isn’t prudent, either out of a misplaced sense of bravado or employer-based pressure to perform (there is no direct statement from Marshall saying that the painkillers were given to him by the team). The sense of bravado, which most athletes have, probably can never be legislated, and the culture of downward pressure to perform no matter what the infirmity has proven immensely difficult to conquer.

But there is another factor here, and that is the general lack of efficacy of painkillers. Warriors coach Steve Kerr took to using a form of medicinal marijuana because the painkillers he was taking for long-lingering symptoms from his back surgery were doing more harm than good. He said he found the marijuana was equally lacking, but he had enough concerns about the deleterious effects of Vicodin, OxyContin and other standard medications assigned to athletes in pain.

“I’m not a pot person; it doesn’t agree with me,” Kerr told CSN Bay Area’s Monte Poole on the Warriors Insider Podcast. “I’ve tried it a few times, and it did not agree with me at all. So I’m not the expert on this stuff. But I do know this: If you’re an NFL player, in particular, and you’ve got a lot of pain, I don’t think there is any question that pot is better for your body than Vicodin. And yet athletes everywhere are prescribed Vicodin like it’s Vitamin C, like it’s no big deal.”

He later expanded on that after the initial “Kerr Is A Sparker” headlines hit the Internet.

“Having gone through a tough spell over the last year with my own recovery from back surgery, a lot of pain, a lot of chronic pain, I had to do a lot of research,” he said. “You get handed prescriptions for Vicodin, OxyContin, Percocet . . . NFL players, that’s what they’re given. That stuff is awful. That stuff is dangerous, the addiction possibility, what it can lead to, the long-term health risks. The issue that’s really important is how do we do what’s best for the players.

“But I understand that it’s a perception issue around the country. The NFL, the NBA, it’s a business. So you don’t want your customers thinking, ‘These guys are a bunch of potheads.’ That’s what it is. To me, it’s only a matter of time before medicinal marijuana is allowed in sports leagues because the education will overwhelm the perception. If you do any research at all, the stuff they’re prescribing is really bad for you and the stuff that they’re banning is fine.”

It is instructive, then, that when Marshall was asked for his position on the NFL’s stance not to include marijuana as a permissible substance for pain management, substance, a Jets public-relations employee who could be heard in the background of the call saying that Marshall “knows better than that.”

But Marshall did answer the question, saying in essence that he fully intends to know better, period.

“That is something that I actually want to research more this offseason when I have time,” he said. “I’m not a guy that knows about the benefits of what it can do for pain and other things. But I’d like to hear others’ opinions and really research the effects it can have on us – positives and negatives.”

In the meantime, sports soldiers on, using increasingly debunked methods for dealing with the pain their businesses inflict upon their employees and issuing warnings about breaching the silence of the workplace. But tales like Marshall’s will continue to surface until the businesses that require him and his like come to grips with the toll of their shortsightedness and, in some cases, neglect.