Raiders draft outlook: Quarterbacks

kessler-coker-split.jpg

Raiders draft outlook: Quarterbacks

Editor’s note: CSNBayArea.com will provide daily content previewing the NFL draft, including position breakdowns, news stories, mock drafts and more. Right now, we’ll analyze draft prospects at quarterback, and whether the Raiders should select one.

The Raiders are set at quarterback. That’s true for a second straight season, something weird to say after the Raiders spent so many years looking for a franchise quarterback.

Derek Carr is a lock to start after making significant strides in his second NFL season. He’s ranked high among the league’s up-and-coming quarterbacks, following a strong statistical campaign that still showed room for growth.

Matt McGloin is a valued backup with a few starts to his credit, and is capable of taking over in a pinch. The Raiders valued his presence, offering the restricted free agent a second-round contract tender.

Who’s here: Derek Carr, Matt McGloin.

Draft needs: The Raiders only carried two quarterbacks last season, but that number could increase to develop a backup in the future. McGloin will be an unrestricted free agent after 2016, and might want to see if he can find an open quarterback competition somewhere else. Even if he’s viewed as a career backup, he might earn more in a different uniform. The Raiders could use a lower-round pick to draft and develop a backup quarterback. Even if that isn’t the case, the team will need a camp arm at least to get through the preseason without taxing their top two passers.

Good fits: The Raiders won’t use a high pick on a passer, but USC’s Cody Kessler might be a quality option if available way down the line. He comes from the pro-style system and can play well under pressure following a myriad of big games at Southern California. He’s also from Bakersfield, which doubles as Derek Carr’s hometown. That could help the pair jell in future seasons. He could be a late pick. If not, the Raiders could aim for an undrafted free agent and hope to strike silver as they did with McGloin in 2013. Alabama’s Jake Coker could be a late third-day prospect or a priority free agent after the draft.

Raiders fans got remarkably little bang for their bucks, or for their hearts

Raiders fans got remarkably little bang for their bucks, or for their hearts

The original Oakland Raiders, the ones who colonized the city for professional sports in 1960, lasted 7,964 days, and died at the hands of a jury in a Los Angeles courtroom.

The re-relocated Oakland Raiders, who fled L.A. and rebooted here in 1995, lasted 7,948 days, and died at the hands of the 32 National Football League owners in a Phoenix boardroom.

There, the similarities end, but not the feelings.

The 32 franchise owners voted Monday at the league meetings in the Arizona Biltmore to give Mark Davis the same thing his father Al fought for 35 years ago – the right to leave. The first time, Al left without the owners’ support; this time, Mark did it eagerly courting the owners’ support, and in a few cases, overt aid.

But whether this move will take any better than the others remains a point only time can reveal. After all, when you chase money, sometimes the money decides not to get caught.

And that ultimately is what dictated this vote, and this move. Mark Davis decided at least three years ago, and perhaps longer, that the team left to him by his parents and future did not lie in Oakland, and worked aggressively if not always efficiently to find a new business home.

Like his father, though, leaving was time-consuming, expensive and came with a great deal of friction. He talked to San Antonio only to find out that Jerry Jones and Bob McNair would never allow him to move his team into their state. He tried to move to Los Angeles in tandem with San Diego’s Dean Spanos and marched cheerily to the altar only to find out at the last minute that it would end as a red wedding.

And even this time, he repeatedly false-started his way through a year of deals and abortive deals before finally convincing his wealthier and haughtier brethren that the new money of Las Vegas was a better bet than the tradition and size of Oakland.

As regards that supposition, only time and short-term greed vs. long-term growth will tell. The league hasn’t exactly covered itself in glory with the multiple ways it screwed up the Los Angeles and San Diego markets, after all, and Davis as the league’s cash-poorest owner is always vulnerable to market forces and bullying partners.

But the possibility that this move might turn out to be an ill-fated choice does nothing to assuage a second generation of jilted Raider fans. Those fans were badly served through most of Oakland Raiders 2.0, deserved better, and ended up with a bittersweet experience, heavy on the bitter. In total:

- There was the gall of watching the third-worst record in football in those 22 years (Detroit and Cleveland), the league high total of 12 non-interim head coaches and the added irritation of watching the team opt to leave just as it was freshly positioned for an extended run of success.

- There was the financial and architectural sinkhole of Mount Davis, which added seats and as-yet-unpaid debt while removing ambience from an old stadium living off the memories of the best Raider teams.

- There was the organizational paralysis of the later Al years and the aggressive wanderlust of the Mark years, leaving the fans to wonder what stable ownership might have offered.

In short, the new generation of Raider fans got remarkably little bang for their bucks, or for their hearts, and still got the same cruel reward their parents did.

Still, the Raiders were theirs, for good or ill, even if the last few years they only kept their team through the fecklessness of their owner. Now that the team is leaving again, these fans have only the commiserations their parents and older relatives who went through it once before, and learned in the most painful way of all that cities and fans don’t own teams – billionaires do, and billionaires are only citizens of the empire of money. Fans and cities and traditions and allegiances are merely wallets toward an end.

But one never knows what the future will bring. They might come back in 2030 and give it another 8,000-day try for the children of the brokenhearted. It would be a particularly perverse thing for the Raiders to do, but there is nothing in their history that suggests they mind treating their fan bases perversely.

The Oakland Raiders are moving to Las Vegas

The Oakland Raiders are moving to Las Vegas

The Raiders no longer belong to Oakland.

The Silver and Black were given the approval to relocate to Las Vegas on Monday in a vote of NFL ownership at the league meetings in Phoenix.

This wasn’t a surprise. Not one bit.

Approval was expected, and the only owner who voted against the move was Miami's Stephen Ross, according to ESPN's Adam Schefter.

The Raiders worked a sweetheart deal with Las Vegas on a reported $1.7 billion stadium project that includes $750 million in public funds and financing by Bank of America. The public will also pick up the tab on infrastructure improvements.

That option contrasts an Oakland plan slammed by the NFL, which wasn’t considered viable. The Raiders haven’t participated in East Bay stadium efforts, focusing solely on their Las Vegas project over the past year.

The Raiders built an attractive plan that doesn’t include NFL-adverse attachments to gambling interests. It did with casino magnate Sheldon was an investor, but they got clear of that when Adelson backed out in February. They lost him and investment firm Goldman Sachs at that time, but recovered quickly when BofA hopped on board.

NFL owners discussed the Raiders application to relocate on Monday morning, and it quickly moved toward a vote.

The Raiders are the third NFL team to relocate in the last 14 months.

The Las Vegas move is contingent on a few unresolved items, but there isn’t anything expected to halt this action.

While the Raiders were approved to relocate, moving vans won’t line up quite yet. A new Las Vegas stadium won’t be complete until 2020, and the Raiders plan to play in Oakland the next two seasons. The Raiders have a team option to play at Oakland Coliseum in 2017 and 2018. They’d be in limbo for 2019, though they have options to play in the Bay Area or in Vegas’ Sam Boyd Stadium, which isn’t NFL ready without renovations.

The Raiders will leave when ready, abandoning Oakland for the second time in 35 seasons. Late owner Al Davis left for Los Angeles in 1982, and returned in 1995 after Oakland offered to expanded Oakland Coliseum. The city is still paying back debt on that renovation. Mayor Libby Schaaf said no public funds would be used for stadium construction, though owner Mark Davis’ major sticking points came over use and control of land on the Coliseum site and conflicts with the Athletics. The A’s also play at Oakland Coliseum on a lease that runs through 2024, though it has an escape clause had the Raiders locked down a football-only stadium there.

Commissioner Roger Goodell and owner Mark Davis are expected to have a press conference announcing Raiders relocation later Monday. Check back for updates and reaction from the team and NFL ownership about this move.