With the world thinking this morning of Barack Obama and the local, national and global ramifications of the election, its nice to know that some things remain unchanged.Like Gary Bettman and Don Fehr in a room arguing about make-whole provisions.True, conflating the events of Tuesday and the non-events of the past several months is probably stretching the points well past its elasticity level, but the NHL lockout has already sped into comedy gridlock. A change of atmosphere seems impossible in the same room with the same players, so maybe changing the air outside will help.And if that doesnt do it, and the owners decide that no games at all are still the optimal solution, then thats how it has to be. If the hockey world cannot bend when the rest of the nation is showing its collective flexibility, then maybe a lost season is all that will save these guys from themselves.RELATED:End in sight? NHL, players bargain deep into nightPut another way, the owners already put two shotgun holes in the Winter Classic, and they dont have any more scheduling threats to run. Only an acknowledgement that this strategy isnt working, a full concession, or a moment of mad atmospheric inspiration saves this season.And of all the things on Obamas to-do list, putting up new sheet rock at the Romneys guest house master bathroom ranks higher than involving himself with the idiocies of the National Hockey League.Hence, the atmospheric inspiration theory. In the few days window after an election, when adrenaline is highest and the job of dashing ones hopes has not yet begun in earnest, one can sense a feeling that even the most intractable problems can be solved, even if they really cant.RELATED:Sharks hopeful talks lead to CBA progress; Boyle mumAnd in a world of stark reality, any illusion can serve as an icebreaker. No pun intended.You see, the NHL and its various minions have passed the point where victory can reasonably be declared by either side. The owners clearly didnt get their main goal, which was Fehr face down in a puddle. The players didnt win their core issue, which was the preservation of their four-sevenths of the revenue pie. And the philosophical argument who has to pay when franchises are run badly, their fellow owners or the players through salary concessions remains unanswered.And so it will be if this deal is ever to be made. It will be a cobbled-together settlement that makes both sides throw up in their mouths, and to date, that has been insufficiently appealing to either side, sure as they are in ultimate victory.Not unlike the country, to be frank. Obamas mandate is smaller, the House of Representatives remains proudly Republican and as such unrepentantly obstructionist. Without getting deeper into the morass of political analogy, the next four years will be four more years of hoisting a pipe organ up the side of a building by hand. Change is coming, but at an annoyingly incremental rate.Thus it will be with whatever the NHL decides to do with its business. It can do a deal just to do a deal and give Gary Bettman and the hardline owners a break from universal revulsion, and the union can agree while holding its nose, proclaiming that getting a point in the other guys building works just as well in the conference room as in the arena.But the longer this weeks negotiations grind on, the more likely that neither side will find such an agreement palatable, and weve pretty well reached the point where there is no more turning radius room before the abyss.So youre left to root for atmospherics, a sense that springs forth in the room of what the hell, if the country can figure out a way not to blow itself up, why dont we give it a go?Or maybe the NHL and NHLPA just needs to introduce a woman with a flag stuck in her hair into the room, just to stand behind whoever happens to be talking at any given moment. That seemed to work last night, and its not like these yobbos have any better ideas.Ray Ratto is a columnist for CSNBayArea.com
Throughout much of his dominant 2016-17 season, the words “Norris Trophy lock” have often preceded Brent Burns’ name.
The 32-year-old has led all NHL blueliners in scoring for the past three months, building upon a strong second half last season in which he helped lead the Sharks to their first ever Stanley Cup Final, and solidifying himself as one of the best defensemen in the game.
In 76 games, Burns has 28 goals – 11 more than any other defenseman – and 45 assists for 73 points and a plus-17 rating. At one point on Feb. 19, he had 14 more points than Erik Karlsson, who was second among NHL defensemen.
But Burns went cold earlier this month. During one stretch, he went nine out of 10 games without finding the scoresheet, and finally snapped a 16-game goal drought with an overtime winner on Tuesday against the Rangers.
Meanwhile, Karlsson has been heating up. A two-time Norris Trophy winner in 2012 and 2015, the Senators defenseman has 13 points in his last 14 games. As of Wednesday morning, Karlsson was just five points behind Burns in scoring, with 15 goals and 53 assists for 68 points and a plus-seven rating.
There’s talk Karlsson could take home a third Norris, snatching it out of Burns’ grasp.
But, probably not.
In an anonymous poll among 21 PHWA members, most of whom get a vote for the Norris Trophy at the conclusion of the regular season, Burns’ designation as the frontrunner seems fairly safe with just six games to go in the regular season.
Of the writers polled, including a broad swath from across North America, 14 told CSN they would likely vote for Burns as the league’s best defensemen if the season ended Tuesday night/Wednesday morning. Three were leaning towards Burns, while only four said they would give it to Karlsson.
One writer polled had Burns first, Tampa Bay’s Viktor Hedman second, and Karlsson third.
Of course, 21 votes is just a small sample size of the PHWA membership. Last season, 183 writers took part in voting for the Norris, according to the final tally. Burns finished third in voting, well behind winner Drew Doughty, while Karlsson was second.
Still, as long as Burns stays in front of Karlsson in the scoring race, it appears he remains in line to become the first Sharks defenseman ever to earn a Norris Trophy.
SAN JOSE – In desperate need of a win and without arguably their best forward over the past two months, the Sharks found a way to get past the New York Rangers, 5-4, in what was – from a purely entertainment standpoint – one of the best games of the season. Let’s dig a little deeper on what is a much happier morning in Sharks-land with our three takeaways…
1 – Tierney takes over
While several of the Sharks depth players contributed, no one was better than fourth line center Chris Tierney, who had a pair of goals, a plus-three rating, and five shots (tied with David Schlemko for the team lead).
His game-tying goal late in the third period was huge, and he credited Jannik Hansen getting him the puck, as Hansen made a slick play on the Mikkel Boedker rebound. Interestingly, Pete DeBoer put those three players out as a line for the first time that night, with less than three minutes to go in regulation.
"I think it was Jannik who made the play. It was a great play,” Tierney said. “I was kind of just wide open. That's a pretty easy goal for me when he makes that play."
Tierney continues to be somewhat enigmatic. Every once in awhile he’ll have a dominant performance like this one (such as Feb. 2 in Vancouver), but then he’s invisible offensively for weeks at a time. To be fair, Tierney doesn’t always have the most highly skilled linemates while centering the fourth line, but when he puts up the kind of game like he did on Tuesday night it does make you wonder why it doesn’t happen more often.
Still, his game against the Rangers provides hope that he’ll be able to fill a void while Logan Couture is out, and we’ve already seen that Tierney can be a very effective player in the postseason, too.
2 – Getting one early
It’s hard to believe that the Sharks didn’t have a lead in a game before Tuesday since March 14 in Buffalo. After that game, which they came back to win fairly easily, they allowed the first goal in all six games of their losing streak and never recovered.
It was evident early that the Sharks were poised to end both their first-goal streak and their losing streak, as the first three shifts were all played in New York’s end. Hansen capped it off by swatting in a loose puck that Boedker had put on net.
“It was critical. I don’t think it was an accident our record over the last six or seven without scoring first,” DeBoer said. “Traditionally we’ve been pretty good in that area. But it’s slipped here in the last six or seven. We found a way tonight. I thought we played a great game.”
Joe Pavelski said: "It was nice coming out in the first and scoring first. It’s been awhile since we had a lead. So, that was good to see. I think everyone was encouraged by that start."
The Sharks improved to 32-9-1 when scoring first. They are 11-17-6 when allowing the opening score.
3 – Melk man delivers one
Is there a more overlooked player on the Sharks roster than Melker Karlsson? He’s not a flashy guy, of course, but Karlsson plays that north-south game that coaches love, and he’s a tenacious penalty killer, too. He now has 10 goals on the season, good for fifth on the team.
His shorthanded goal, on a two-on-one with Tierney, gave the Sharks a 2-1 lead just before the first intermission.
“They took away the pass to Tierns there,” Karlsson said. “I looked up a little bit, and it went in. Low blocker is usually a good shot.”
Karlsson was playing in his first game since missing the previous eight with a lower body injury. As one of those depth guys, is there more responsibility for him and others to help fill the void left by Couture?
“Yeah. We’ve always got to be there, but especially when Logan is out. He’s a big player for us,” Karlsson said.