VanDerveer gets win No. 800, Stanford beats USF

347165.jpg

VanDerveer gets win No. 800, Stanford beats USF

Dec. 22, 2010BOX SCORENCAA SCOREBOARD
WOMEN'S BASKETBALL PAGE

SANFRANCISCO (AP) Stanford's Tara VanDerveer became the sixth women'scoach to reach the elite 800 wins mark Wednesday night, doing so in herthird try as the eighth-ranked Cardinal routed San Francisco 100-45 andformer Stanford stars turned coaches Jennifer Azzi and Katy Steding.

KILLION: VanDerveer's 800th uniquely Bay Area's
Kayla Pedersen scored her team'sfirst eight points of the second half on the way to 16 and grabbed acareer-high 20 rebounds to lead Stanford (7-2), which was coming offlosses last Thursday at No. 16 DePaul and then at fifth-rankedTennessee on Sunday.VanDerveer is 800-197 in 32 seasonsas a head coach, 25 of those years at Stanford - where she is 648-146.Azzi embraced the Hall of Fame coach after the final buzzer sounded,then fans and players held up 800 signs reading "Congratulations Tara."Azzi and Steding presented VanDerveer with flowers and the game ball ina ceremony at midcourt."Eight hundred's a lot of games,"VanDerveer said. "It's a little ironic with Jennifer and Katy. It'sapropos it's with them. Jennifer's taken part in a lot of these wins.I'm just a little bit blown away about Jennifer and Katy being here andthe large number."VanDerveer joins fellow 800-gamewinners Pat Summitt of Tennesse, former Texas coach Jody Conradt,Rutgers' C. Vivian Stringer, Sylvia Hatchell of North Carolina andBarbara Stevens - who won her 800th just this past Sunday for DivisionII Bentley University in Massachusetts.VanDerveer beat a pair of familiarfaces to reach the milestone, facing first-year USF coach and Hall ofFamer Azzi and her associate head coach, Steding. The two women werepart of Stanford's first NCAA title in 1990 and on theVanDerveer-coached 1996 Olympic team that won gold in Atlanta.Nnemkadi Ogwumike, Joslyn Tinkle andSara James all scored 14 points for Stanford, which held the Dons to24.3 percent shooting. The Cardinal played without starting freshmanforward Chiney Ogwumike, who turned her left ankle during the morningshootaround.Kelly Jo Mullaney scored 13 points but the Dons went 11 minutes, 7 seconds without scoring spanning halftime.Azzi, the Pac-10 player of the yearin that 32-1 title run in '90, and Steding received a rousing ovationfrom the Stanford section when introduced. The coaches from both sideschatted before tipoff and planned to catch up over dinner afterward.Azzi didn't schedule this game,which was on the calendar before she was hired in April to take overthe struggling Dons program. Her team is 2-10 - eight of those defeatsblowouts - and lost its seventh straight game. USF dropped its 15th ina row against Stanford in the series dating back to Dec. 15, 1984.VanDerveer's Cardinal, who havereached the Final Four the past three seasons, dropped five spots fromthird in this week's rankings after the two losses.After USF pulled within 23-21 onVania Singleterry's 3-pointer at the 8:16 mark of the first half,Stanford answered with a 25-0 run the rest of the way in which Jamesscored eight points and Ogwumike seven in a row. The Cardinal led 48-21at the break.Stanford plays No. 4 Xavier onTuesday afternoon at Maples Pavilion, several hours before top-rankedConnecticut goes for its 90th straight victory at Pacific in nearbyStockton. Then, the Huskies visit Stanford on Dec. 30 in a highlyanticipated rematch of last season's national title game won 53-47 byUConn after Stanford led 20-12 at halftime.The Cardinal are the last team to beat the Huskies, in the 2008 national semifinals in Tampa, Fla.Nobody expected the overmatched Donsto stay with Stanford for long. Azzi said beforehand she just hoped herplayers gained some valuable experience playing against a top programin the country, but they hung tough early.Stanford is 21-9 all time againstSan Francisco, which finished seventh in the eight-team West CoastConference the past four seasons and went 5-27 overall and 1-13 in WCCplay last season.Former major league pitcher VidaBlue sat in the front row. Elementary students from the Oakland schoolwhere he volunteers sang the national anthem.

Carr takes responsibility for poor Raiders passing game, 'We played awful'

Carr takes responsibility for poor Raiders passing game, 'We played awful'

KANSAS CITY, Mo. – Derek Carr has made 44 starts as Raiders quarterback. They all haven’t been pretty. Most of them have, but the 25-year has hit a few bumps during what is generally considered a sterling start to his career.

He threw some costly interceptions in 2015, and was learning on the job as a rookie. He’s been nothing short of awesome this season. Until Thursday night, certainly one of his worst as a professional.

Ponder this stat line: 17-for-41, 117 passing yards, no touchdowns, no picks. His 49.1 passer rating was career low.

That’s un-Carr-like, to say the least.

While his receivers dropped four passes, there were many others not in the tally that should’ve been caught. Special teams made some costly mistakes and the defense had some first-half lapses.

Carr wasn’t afraid to say quarterback play had a huge impact on a 21-13 loss to the Kansas City Chiefs, a nationally televised game that dropped the Raiders to 10-3 and into second-place in the AFC West.

“It was definitely a bad night, no way of getting around that,” Carr said. “I hate to have a bad night coming on this one, out of all the games we’ve had. Obviously, we didn’t do enough. 

“I feel very responsible for that because of being the leader of the offense and the team. I feel sick to my stomach when we put something like that out there on film. It hurts, I can promise you that. I put too much time into this to go do something like that.”

Carr didn’t want to make excuses after this loss. He didn’t blame his right pinky, which he dislocated in two places against Carolina, which still causes discomfort.

“It definitely wasn’t the finger’s fault,” Carr said.

He didn’t blame frigid temperatures, or whether that had an effect on his grip or his ailing digit. It certainly might have, but the Raiders quarterback never plays the blame game.

Despite the passing game’s struggles, Latavius Murray ran well and the defense clamped down in the second half. That kept the Raiders down one score most of the second half, but they couldn’t cross the goal line.

The Raiders had more than eight minutes to put a game-trying drive together, but stalled at the Kansas City 19-yard line and turned it over on downs.

Carr put one touchdown drive together, late in the first half that made it 21-10. The defense forced two turnovers in the red zone early in the third quarter, but the Raiders only got three points from those opportunities.

That, much like everything else that happened in the passing game, was uncharacteristic of an explosive unit.

“Everything about tonight was unusual, to be honest,” Carr said. “To have our defense step up for us and make plays, and for us to go out there and not execute, do things we don’t do… That’s why it’s frustrating. That why I promise you I’m not worried.

“We played awful. It wasn’t good enough, but I’m not worried because I know the guys in the locker room. I’m not worried one bit, but it just sucks. We have to take it. We have to take the punch, but I’m not worried. I think we’re going to bounce back.”

Raiders' magic dissipates, but valuable lesson about contending learned

Raiders' magic dissipates, but valuable lesson about contending learned

So the Oakland Raiders are good, but not magical, let alone soaked in destiny. So they can make every game a hard slog for the opponent, but they are not invulnerable. So they can be inefficient, and too sure of themselves, and terribly wasteful when they’re cold.

In other words, they are part of the National Football League – no longer too good to be true.

Their performance against the Chiefs in Kansas City was a pyramid of blown opportunities, opportunities made necessary by a terrible start. A week ago, against a borderline playoff team, they could get away with it. Thursday, on hostile ground, against a team that has lost three of its previous 23 regular season games and has a defense that specializes in standing on your chest until you whistle Yankee Doodle through your navel, they couldn’t.

The result of the 21-13 loss in a game with 12 more points than degrees of temperature is that the Raiders are now the fifth-best team in the American Football Conference rather than the first-best team with four more chances to change that position.

In other words, Thursday’s defeat only provided this much wisdom: The Raiders are a good team vulnerable to other good teams with an iron-plated sense of purpose, stubborn defenses that can apply and maintain a chokehold for hours on end, and offenses that don’t feel compelled to imitate Oakland’s offense by getting into a shootout.

And also this: There is nothing that would necessarily prevent them from beating the Chiefs in case of a third match, even though Kansas City held them to fewer points in two games than they scored in every other game save one. They are still, as the pedants say, “in the argument.”

But they have flaws to be exposed against the right team in the right situation. Kansas City has been that team twice, and New England probably is, but there the list probably stops. Nobody in the AFC North or South seems terribly capable of matching them in neutral conditions, but here’s the other bone spur:

The playoffs are not about neutral conditions.

The Raiders have come a long way in what most people think is a long time, but in fact in terms of team construction, you can throw out everything before 2013, and almost everything before 2015. They are just now getting a full understanding of the hardest part of becoming a Super Bowl contender – the other Super Bowl contenders.

Yes, Kansas City has an indifferent playoff history under Andy Reid, but it is clear that under current conditions the Chiefs are serious players. And while we have no link to how the Raiders would fare against new England, we are pretty sure that they wouldn’t want to play the second weekend of January arse-deep in snow in Foxborough.

The point? Now they get how hard this contender stuff really is. They could not have learned that lesson any other way – not anyone they’ve played yet save Kansas City.

Their next lessons come in Weeks 16 and 17, when they face the frantically desperate Indianapolis Colts in Oakland and then the Broncos in Denver the week after. Desperate teams can be very difficult indeed, especially to teams that are safe and dry and home, playoff-wise.

And then there are the actual playoffs, which if they were played today would have the Raiders traveling to Houston for a very winnable game against the stultifying Texans. The week after, they could be either in Kansas City again or in New England, getting a gut full of visiting field disadvantage.

But as a learning experience, the Raiders may have come out very well indeed. They now know in very real and personal ways the real difference between where they think they should be and where they are, as well as how many ways this can go terribly wrong between now and then.

And also how well it can go, if they learn what the Chiefs taught them again Thursday.